Quilting sutures compared with sponge packing in septolplasty and turbinoplasty.

INTRODUCTION: There is a lack of consensus regarding the need for nasal packing after a septoplasty. The use of nasal packing has been proposed to reduce bleeding, synechiae and haematomas. Despite these advantages evidence is scant to support postoperative packing. Furthermore, packing is not an innocuous procedure and can cause complications. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy of quilting sutures compared with sponge nasal packing on haemostasis, haematomas and wound healing following septoplasty. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Seventy-six patients with nasal septum deviation requiring septoplasty and turbinoplasy with radiofrequency were included. Following surgery, fifty patients were selected randomly for septoplasty with one quilting suture. And twenty-six patients had sponge nasal packing. Haemostatic properties, formation of haematomas, formation of synechiae, the patients' pain and bleeding on removal of the packing were evaluated. RESULTS: Both techniques were equally effective in the control of postoperative bleeding, haematoma and synechiae formation following septoplasty. Sponge packing was associated with significant pain and bleeding on removal. CONCLUSION: The use of quilting sutures like sponge packing is efficient in controlling bleeding, synechiae and haematomas after septoplasty and turbinoplasty.

Comparación entre una sutura transfixiante y el taponamiento nasal en la septoplastia y turbinoplastia / Quilting sutures compared with sponge packing in septolplasty and turbinoplasty

Introducción: No existe un consenso sobre la necesidad del taponamiento nasal después de una septoplastia. El uso de los taponamientos ha sido propuesto con el fin de reducir las hemorragias, sinequias o hematomas después de este procedimiento. A pesar de estas ventajas la evidencia del uso de un taponamiento nasal es baja. Adicionalmente este procedimiento no es agradable para el paciente y puede tener complicaciones.ObjetivoEl propósito de este estudio es investigar la eficacia de la sutura transfixiante o transeptal comparada con el taponamiento nasal. Analizar el control de la epistaxis, hematomas y sinequias después de una septoplastia.Material y métodosSetenta y seis pacientes con indicación de septoplastia y turbinoplastia con radiofrecuencia fueron incluidos en el estudio. Pseudoaleatoriamente se utilizó una sutura transfixiante en 50 pacientes y taponamiento nasal en 26 pacientes después de la cirugía. En los 2 grupos se comparó el porcentaje de epistaxis, hematomas y sinequias. Además, el dolor y la epistaxis de los pacientes al retirar el taponamiento nasal.ResultadosTanto la sutura transfixiante como el taponamiento nasal tienen resultados similares en cuanto al control de las epistaxis, sinequias y hematomas después de la septoplastia con radiofrecuencia de cornetes. Los pacientes con taponamiento nasal presentaron dolor y epistaxis autolimitada en el momento de retirar el taponamiento nasal.ConclusiónEl uso de la sutura transfixiante después de una septoplastia y turbinoplastia con radiofrecuencia es igual de eficaz que el taponamiento nasal para el control de epistaxis, sinequias y hematomas. (AU)

Introduction: There is a lack of consensus regarding the need for nasal packing after a septoplasty. The use of nasal packing has been proposed to reduce bleeding, synechiae and haematomas. Despite these advantages evidence is scant to support postoperative packing. Furthermore, packing is not an innocuous procedure and can cause complications.ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy of quilting sutures compared with sponge nasal packing on haemostasis, haematomas and wound healing following septoplasty.Material and methodsSeventy-six patients with nasal septum deviation requiring septoplasty and turbinoplasy with radiofrequency were included. Following surgery, fifty patients were selected randomly for septoplasty with one quilting suture. And twenty-six patients had sponge nasal packing. Haemostatic properties, formation of haematomas, formation of synechiae, the patients’ pain and bleeding on removal of the packing were evaluated.ResultsBoth techniques were equally effective in the control of postoperative bleeding, haematoma and synechiae formation following septoplasty. Sponge packing was associated with significant pain and bleeding on removal.ConclusionThe use of quilting sutures like sponge packing is efficient in controlling bleeding, synechiae and haematomas after septoplasty and turbinoplasty. (AU)

Quilting sutures compared with sponge packing in septolplasty and turbinoplasty. / Comparación entre una sutura transfixiante y el taponamiento nasal en la septoplastia y turbinoplastia.

INTRODUCTION: There is a lack of consensus regarding the need for nasal packing after a septoplasty. The use of nasal packing has been proposed to reduce bleeding, synechiae and haematomas. Despite these advantages evidence is scant to support postoperative packing. Furthermore, packing is not an innocuous procedure and can cause complications. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy of quilting sutures compared with sponge nasal packing on haemostasis, haematomas and wound healing following septoplasty. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Seventy-six patients with nasal septum deviation requiring septoplasty and turbinoplasy with radiofrequency were included. Following surgery, fifty patients were selected randomly for septoplasty with one quilting suture. And twenty-six patients had sponge nasal packing. Haemostatic properties, formation of haematomas, formation of synechiae, the patients' pain and bleeding on removal of the packing were evaluated. RESULTS: Both techniques were equally effective in the control of postoperative bleeding, haematoma and synechiae formation following septoplasty. Sponge packing was associated with significant pain and bleeding on removal. CONCLUSION: The use of quilting sutures like sponge packing is efficient in controlling bleeding, synechiae and haematomas after septoplasty and turbinoplasty.

Aplicación del índice acústico de calidad vocal para la cuantificación objetiva de la severidad de la disfonía / Application of the acoustic voice quality index for objective measurement of dysphonia severity

Introducción: En las últimas décadas se han estudiado muchos parámetros acústicos con el fin de cuantificar la disfonía, sin embargo las medidas actuales podrían no ser sensibles a la calidad vocal percibida. En un metaanálisis donde se evaluó la relación entre la calidad global percibida de la voz se identificaron numerosas medidas acústicas que no dependen de la extracción del periodo fundamental tales como las derivadas del cepstrum y que pueden ser usadas tanto en vocales sostenidas como en habla conectada. Un método específico recientemente diseñado para cuantificar la severidad global de la disfonía es el índice acústico de calidad vocal (AVQI) que es un constructo multivariante que combina múltiples marcadores acústicos para generar un único número que se correlaciona razonablemente con la calidad global vocal. Métodos: Esta investigación se basó en un archivo de voces grabadas procedentes de dos grupos de individuos: 60 personas sanas vocalmente y 58 participantes con trastornos vocales. Se grabaron vocales sostenidas y una muestral de habla conectada para su análisis y así obtener los seis parámetros incluidos en el AVQI utilizando el programa Praat. El análisis estadístico de los resultados se llevó a cabo con el programa SPSS para Windows versión 12.0. Resultados: Correspondencia entre el valor del AVQI y el grado de severidad global de la disfonía: correlación r = 0,68 (p < 0,000), y entre el AVQI y el parámetro B del GRABS: r = 0,68 (p < 0,000). Conclusiones: Los resultados obtenidos muestran una buena correlación con la calidad vocal percibida. En conclusión, el AVQI es una medida multivariante, accesible, factible y razonablemente válida para medir clínicamente la severidad global de la severidad de la disfonía (AU)

Introduction: Over the past several decades, many acoustic parameters have been studied as sensitive to and to measure dysphonia. However, current acoustic measures might not be sensitive measures of perceived voice quality. A meta-analysis which evaluated the relationship between perceived overall voice quality and several acoustic-phonetic correlates, identified measures that do not rely on the extraction of the fundamental period, such the measures derived from the cepstrum, and that can be used in sustained vowel as well as continuous speech samples. A specific and recently developed method to quantify the severity of overall dysphonia is the acoustic voice quality index (AVQI) that is a multivariate construct that combines multiple acoustic markers to yield a single number that correlates reasonably with overall vocal quality. Methods: This research is based on one pool of voice recordings collected in two sets of subjects: 60 vocally normal and 58 voice disordered participants. A sustained vowel and a sample of connected speech were recorded and analyzed to obtain the six parameters included in the AVQI using the program Praat. Statistical analysis was completed using SPSS for Windows, version 12.0. Results: Correlation between perception of overall voice quality and AVQI: A significant difference exists (t (95) = 9.5; p<.000) between normal and dysphonic voices. Conclusions: The findings of this study demonstrate the clinical feasibility of the AVQI as a measure of dysphonia severity (AU)

Application of the acoustic voice quality index for objective measurement of dysphonia severity. / Aplicación del índice acústico de calidad vocal para la cuantificación objetiva de la severidad de la disfonía.

INTRODUCTION: Over the past several decades, many acoustic parameters have been studied as sensitive to and to measure dysphonia. However, current acoustic measures might not be sensitive measures of perceived voice quality. A meta-analysis which evaluated the relationship between perceived overall voice quality and several acoustic-phonetic correlates, identified measures that do not rely on the extraction of the fundamental period, such the measures derived from the cepstrum, and that can be used in sustained vowel as well as continuous speech samples. A specific and recently developed method to quantify the severity of overall dysphonia is the acoustic voice quality index (AVQI) that is a multivariate construct that combines multiple acoustic markers to yield a single number that correlates reasonably with overall vocal quality. METHODS: This research is based on one pool of voice recordings collected in two sets of subjects: 60 vocally normal and 58 voice disordered participants. A sustained vowel and a sample of connected speech were recorded and analyzed to obtain the six parameters included in the AVQI using the program Praat. Statistical analysis was completed using SPSS for Windows, version 12.0. RESULTS: Correlation between perception of overall voice quality and AVQI: A significant difference exists (t(95) = 9.5; p<.000) between normal and dysphonic voices. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study demonstrate the clinical feasibility of the AVQI as a measure of dysphonia severity.